I spent a day over the weekend at a customer's facility; they are a large production house with a decent number of edit, grade and audio rooms. An old industry pal has recently become the tech manager there and he's trying to get them up to standard. So - I've been in calibrating monitors and he also asked me to give him an assessment of how easily he could LUT their plasmas to get them to Rec.709.
The first observation is how bad Barco broadcast displays have become! I was very used to them in the eighties at the BBC but the RHDM-2301 is a sorry excuse for a TV monitor. The marketing material say;
The RHDM-2301P is the perfect reference monitor for Directors of Photography (DoP) on set during film acquisition, as well as for dailies processing. The Grade-1 color accuracy and stability means that two RHDM-2310P monitors will show identical pictures even on two distant sets.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59e63/59e63b51a0b43d0187a64b8bfaf33a66046a7906" alt=""
It's also kinda pointless for them to tell you the values of the primaries as well! They can't be adjusted.
So - rant about Barcos over, here are some test results for the cheaper Panasonic 32" plasmas they also had;
Using LightSpace I profiled the display. You can see the gamut of the TV is bigger than Rec.709. The other worry is how bad the RGB separation is. However; after taking a 17-point profile (around 5000 colours) the software reports better than 100% compliance. Good news!data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6afe/f6afef0e65261a5ef56f4f6b53ea593523e6f9da" alt=""
This is the resulting LUT cube and you can see 709 is entirely contained. There are no tightly packed points anywhere indicating a LUT will make things better.
So, loading the cube into our ISmini LUT box and re-running;
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d27b/9d27b44d0893c646c78807b20bfebf1926af42cd" alt=""
No comments:
Post a Comment